I think rereading “The Handmaid’s Tale” made me dislike this novel even more. It’s unbelievable that this won a “joint” Booker prize, and shows how the publishing machine and Atwood’s rank must have so much clout. I would have tossed this book aside, if it weren’t for (parts of) Aunt Lydia’s tale and the fact that I was reading this book for book club. “The Testaments” pales so in comparison to its lofty predecessor. “The Handmaid’s Tale” is literature. This is young adult pulp fiction. I’ll avoid spoilers and just say there are so many gaping holes in the plot. So many. And the tone of the two teenagers’ testaments is painful.
Gwenamon says: Too neat, predictable, and illogical. So disappointing!
I was hesitant to re-read this novel since I remembered it fondly from its debut in my late teens. But I decided to at least try again, before I read “The Testaments.” And full disclaimer – I’m not an Atwood fan. This novel is incredible – the tone, the pacing, the subtlety, the tight plot. What a dystopian vision. I was sad for it to end.
Gwenamon says: A marvel
This novel. It’s so well told. Each chapter introduces and weaves characters together in a a multigenerational story that’s tethered by each of them making their way to the Big Oakland Powwow. “There There” is about identity, culture, substances, fear, love, violence, hope, family, and reckoning.
Gwenamon says: Well done
This novel is about unambitious Barrett who can’t find love and sees a vision in the park one night. He lives with his older brother, Tyler, a tired musician who is hitting a wall whenever he tries writing a wedding song for his dying girlfriend, Beth. The three of them live together in Brooklyn. There’s little plot and lots of meandering days in this novel. It’s lack lustre except for Cunningham’s beautiful writing. But even that didn’t redeem this novel for me.
Gwenamon says: Meh
This is a(n often brutal) satire about four young college graduates living in San Francisco. It’s cleverly written and a few times I honestly did laugh out loud. However, I’d say the language and self-awareness goes over-the-top during Linda’s diatribes. Some of those I just had to skim. It’s pretty impressive that Tulathimutte seems to work every supposed millennial influence, concern, or criticism into this novel.
Gwenamon says: Well done and having lived in SF, I loved the conjuring up of its neighbourhoods
John Carreyrou uncovers the story of Standford dropout’s, CEO Elizabeth Holmes’, multibillion startup – Theranos. It was built on smoke and mirrors, and endorsed by big-name investors. Carreyrou writes of Holmes’ sociopath duplicity in promising to revolutionize the medical industry with easier and quicker blood tests, while raising billions of dollars with technology which didn’t work. The book doesn’t discuss Holmes’ comeuppance – probably in order to get the story out in time. She’s still awaiting trial.
Gwenamon says: A quick, easy read that that’s kind of unsatisfying because of where it ends
Greta tries a treatment to jolt her out of a deep depression brought on by her dear twin brother’s, Felix’s, death. The treatment’s effects take her between her own time (1985) and two others – 1918 and 1941. She has to confront different issues, choices, and social mores while getting another chance to listen to her heart.
Gwenamon says: Decent and a quick read